Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Engineering a better / worse airplane

Discussion in 'What If - Other' started by T. A. Gardner, Apr 20, 2008.

  1. Carronade

    Carronade Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,281
    Likes Received:
    846
    I believe it was only the shortage of the Packard built R/R Merilin engines that kept it from being "upengined" with that lovely engine.

    Surprised no one picked up on this; there were Merlin-engined P-40s, F and L models. As you might expect they had better high-altitude performance, although I don't think they were the absolute fastest P-40s. Apparently they were used extensively by the USAAF in the MTO, also be British/Empire forces. I recall reading the OOBs in Carlo d'Este's Anzio book and being surprised how many squadrons were still using P-40s at that point, early 1944.
     
  2. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    Well that was from the Joe Bauger page, or my own supposition from it I should say. I figured that since there were only 2,011 of the two models produced, out of the 14,000 + P-40s, it might have been the shortage of the engines as much as anything.

    Just my sort of "take" on why more of them weren't produced with that engine.

    See:

    Factsheets : Curtiss P-40

    for production numbers of the F and L series.
     

Share This Page