Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Germany's Pocket Battleships

Discussion in 'The War at Sea' started by Boba Nette, May 18, 2005.

  1. Boba Nette

    Boba Nette New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2004
    Messages:
    3,142
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago
    via TanksinWW2
    How many were there and what were the names?
     
  2. me262 phpbb3

    me262 phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,627
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Porter,TX
    via TanksinWW2
    germany build 3 of them:

    deutchland
    later renamed lutzow by hitler's order nov 15 1939
    laid feb 5 1929, launched may 19 1931
    scuttled may 3-4 1945

    admiral scheer
    laid june 25 1931, launched april 1 1933
    sunk april 10 1945

    admiral graf spee
    laid aug 23 1932, launched june 30 1934
    scuttled dec 17 1939, after battle of la plata estuary
     
  3. Tiornu

    Tiornu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    21
    via TanksinWW2
    Their official rating, "armored ships," was taken from the wording of the Versailles Treaty, which in turn took its lead from the official designations of various coast defense ships in Dutch and Scandinavian service at the time. After WWII broke out, the KM switched the rating to "heavy cruiser," which was a much closer fit.
    Ships D and E were begun as enlarged armored ships (c20,000 tons) until it became clear that the new French Dunkerques could make mincemeat of such things. Some quick design work enlarged the ships beyond 30,000 tons, and they were relaid as battleships; these were the Scharnhorsts.
    One final project took shape under the Z Plan. The Cruiser P class would have included twelve ships similar to the original D. This was canned around the time when the OPQ design got under way.
     
  4. Boba Nette

    Boba Nette New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2004
    Messages:
    3,142
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Chicago
    via TanksinWW2
    Thanks.I had forgotten about the Lutzow.I knew Deutchland had been renamed ,but couldn't remember what the new name was.
     
  5. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    I've always found it interesting that they renamed her after the only German battlecruiser to be sunk in the Battle of Jutland in 1916.
     
  6. Tiornu

    Tiornu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    21
    via TanksinWW2
    More immediately they gave her the name that had just be freed up by the sale of the Hipper-class cruiser Lutzow to the Soviets.
     
  7. PMN1

    PMN1 recruit

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    Any truth to the storey that the name was changed just in case she was sunk - bad for morale if a ship nmaed Deutchland was sunk.
     
  8. Tiornu

    Tiornu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    21
    via TanksinWW2
    Raeder suggested the name change to Hitler to pre-empt the possibility of "Deutschland" being sunk and to confuse British intelligence.
     
  9. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    One does wonder if those who decided to name the ship DEUTSCHLAND even considered the possibility that she might be sunk in a war.
     
  10. Tiornu

    Tiornu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    21
    via TanksinWW2
    Wasn't America sunk a week ago?
    The Royal Navy has had ten or so Britannias over the years. In fact, Britannia had the misfortune of sinking in WWI. The Japanese had their country sunk twice during WWII. Darn the luck.
     
  11. me262 phpbb3

    me262 phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,627
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Porter,TX
    via TanksinWW2
    but not by enemy action, it was on purpose
     
  12. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Took 26 days to do it, too; she was definitely a tough old lady. :wink:
     
  13. Ebar

    Ebar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    On a space station in geosynchronous orbit above y
    via TanksinWW2
    Well much of that 26 days would have been spent looking at the damage inflicted by the last weapon hit.


    (can't be a nice job to have to go aboard a ship you've just tried to sink in case you end up in a "whoops that one did the trick lads! RUN!" situation :-? )
     
  14. PMN1

    PMN1 recruit

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    Where's all that fucking water coming from???

    :smok:
     
  15. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    "Should we abandon ship, sir?"

    "It's too late for that; it's already abandoned us!"
    :wink:
     

Share This Page