Moderators are here for YOU!

post subject

I presume that 'we' is the Royal 'we' Roel?

 

spam

I see 'Xtraa watch M' sneaked through with a Jap porn site!

 

http://www.fun-online.sk/forum/viewtopi ... f4c0bd2032

This is what Merlin is refering to.

 

Didn't see that one....stupid hoser.

(I get board so I search for spam accounts.....)

 

No reason to post links to the spam posts or post in them - they'll be removed as soon as a moderator sees them.

 

Chris.

So you don't want us to highlight them for you or the team of mods?

 

You're welcome to if you want, but we will spot them fairly quickly, so it isn't really necessary.

 

Private messaging is probably the better option to do that.

 

I agree - but in either case, if it's less than half a day old, a moderator has probably not been on the forum anyway, and thus sending a PM will not help much

 

question

This recent posting has opened up a question in my mind, I viewed the 'Members' list to see if these people were on it, they are.
I wonder just how many of the 814 listed members we actually have, by that I mean how many true members? 100? 200?
No need for a poll, just a trivia thought. :roll:

 

Re: question

They are for the moment. It is an ongoing thing...

 

Re: post subject

No... As you can see from Christian's post, the Admin (Ricky, Christian and me), along with the Moderators, agree on this point. It is not me stating the rules from my lofty throne, and in fact it never is or has been.

 

If anything, I have editing rights to all files on the forum, so I'd be the true evil dictator

 

Mu ha ha ha ha ! etc

 

post subject

Re registered members, must be really difficult to know who are genuine, seeing that from my Wednesday post membership has increased from 814 to 840.

 

We were at 900 last week, if you catch my drift.

 

post subject,

Difficult Job Roel, do you think we will ever know just how many members we really have?, I suspect less than 200.
Any way, what are you doing playing on computer at this hour? excuse for me I'm retired, :lol:

 

Re: post subject,

It's not really possible to say - a lot of people have posted once or twice, so the genuine member count would depend on whether these members should be included as well.

I don't think there are actually any statistics on what the normal active/inactive ratio is for forums.

 

members

My God, we've cracked 900 again! Eliminating these is like painting the Forth Bridge!!

 

post members

This is past a joke, 921!!!!! Can I suggest that you (Spam removers) delete all posts of 1 and 0, there are pages of these, if by chance you remove a genuine interested visitor, hard luck, they will post again if genuine; the figure of 921 members is laughable. Let's get back to a genuine number, I reckon less than 200.