Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Mosin-Nagant M44

Discussion in 'Small Arms and Edged Weapons' started by SGT. SHLITZ, Sep 22, 2007.

  1. pj308

    pj308 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello Sgt.Schlitz
    Nice Mosin-I have a 91/30 and and it holds 1 inch groups at 100 yards. I have shot the 44 before and I agree that it kicks like a mule. The reason it shoots better with the bayonet deployed is because the bayonet picks up the vibration from the barrell when the round goes off allowing for better accuracy. If you reload for this I have a good recipe.
    PJ
     
  2. pavdude

    pavdude Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2009
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    :D
     
  3. paratrooper506

    paratrooper506 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    2
    hey I have fired an m91/30 and depending on how tight you hold it into your shoulder the less recoil there should be the only reason m44s kick so bad is because they are shorter
     
  4. ferret

    ferret recruit

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    1
    Good day folks, this is my first post here. I am an American and a proud
    owner of a Russian Mosin Nagant m44 rifle. The thing is heavy, kicks like
    a mule, but is a stunning tribute to simple rugged and extremely effective
    Soviet weapons design of the era. I was hoping to take my rifle hunting
    this winter but am having trouble with optics. i need a long eye relief
    scope but i measured that i need about ten inches of relief, and i here tell
    that will make optics very ineffective at range, in the odd event i even
    find a scope that will work at all. i have aloso considered drill and tap to
    mount a scope like it is on the classic sniper varient, like the rifle the great Vasily Zaytsev.Though WWII was a bloody and terrible peice of our history, it is my favorite era of history, followed closely by the American west circa 1800's.

    thanks fer yer time y'all, and good day to you!
     
    SMLE shooter likes this.
  5. MarineRaider

    MarineRaider Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    2
    hmm, my best bet is that it was made to be more light than the regular Mosin-Nagant. But the mosin-nagant was already pretty light. hmm, intresting.
     
  6. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    Just found an excellent site for the Moisin-Nagant, quite interesting:

    Main Page
     
  7. SMLE shooter

    SMLE shooter Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2008
    Messages:
    460
    Likes Received:
    21
    The Mosin Nagant is not a light gun.
     
  8. paratrooper506

    paratrooper506 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    2
    your right its not the m44 was not meant to be lighter it was meant to be used for urban fighting because it was shorter
     
  9. machine shop tom

    machine shop tom Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    Messages:
    432
    Likes Received:
    44
    The M91/30 weighs about 8.75 lbs, less bayonet. The M44 weighs about 9 lbs due to the permanently attached bayonet and hardware. The M38 carbine weighs about 7.5 lbs.

    The SMLE rifles all weighed around 8.75 lbs, with the Jungle Carbine, the Mk5, was about 2lbs less.

    So the M-N rifles weighed about the same as the Enfield rifles. The Jungle Carbine was admittedly lighter than the M-N carbines, but it was not generally a success and production of it ended in 1947.

    The greatest advantage the Enfield had over all the other bolt actions was the 10rd magazine capacity.

    tom
     

Share This Page