Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Operation Uranus

Discussion in 'Eastern Europe October 1939 to February 1943' started by Epsillon, Oct 9, 2007.

  1. PzJgr

    PzJgr Drill Instructor

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2000
    Messages:
    8,386
    Likes Received:
    890
    Location:
    Jefferson, OH
    What I meant is that I agree with you that Zhukov is not the sole man responsible for the victory at Stalingrad. So there is no argument between us.
     
  2. Epsillon

    Epsillon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    1
    oh I thaught you said you there is no argument.
     
  3. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,469
    Likes Received:
    2,208
  4. Sloniksp

    Sloniksp Ставка

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    6,321
    Likes Received:
    460
    I have mentioned this before, but this is the only book written by Glantz which I have a problem with and feel a little uneasy about. In fact more and more historians are starting to argue against it in recent times as well.

    The major argument to this book is while the intial assualt was a failure in terms of destroying the army. It did accomplish its primary goal, which was to prevent Manstein from reaching Stalingrad in order to rescue the 6th army. Historians now argue that while a large force was sent out to fight their main objective was to keep Manstein in place, which it accomlished very well.
     
  5. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,469
    Likes Received:
    2,208
    I sort of don´t get it, Slo...

    The book is all about how close Zhukov was getting through the AGC and truly destroying the whole German front. We are talking about "inches" here. It is true Zhukov used alot of men and tanks as usual and he lost at Rzhev but ...

    I know the book is huge but like Kharkov 1943 you have to read to understand. Zhukov was trying to grab alot more than just Stalingrad, he was going to win the war in Dec 1942.
     
  6. Epsillon

    Epsillon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    1
    I first wanted to do something on operation mars but that is the only book that is available in our library.


    Anyways did operaion mars impact Zhukovs decision in Operation Uranus?
     
  7. Sloniksp

    Sloniksp Ставка

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    6,321
    Likes Received:
    460
    This is the argument against Glantz's claim

    Operation Mars

    Yes he was trying the win the war as soon as possible but not careless fashion ;)
     
  8. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,469
    Likes Received:
    2,208
    From one of the reviews....

    As Glantz clearly demonstrates, the well-known Operation Uranus counterattack at Stalingrad was actually a strategic deception for the main effort near Moscow. Soviet Marshal Zhukov wanted to destroy ArmeeGruppe Center but he ordered the Stalingrad attack to precede Operation Mars in order to divert German attention and reinforcements to the south. Unfortunately for him, the Germans did not become diverted and their defenses remained steady. Unlike the 6th Army at Stalingrad, the German 9th Army was well entrenched and had powerful mobile reserves. Zhukov's attack was a spectacular failure despite larger forces being used there than in the Stalingrad counteroffensive. The Soviets failed primarily because they could not breach the German defenses quickly and the Germans (Field Marshal Model) did a superb job of shifting mobile reserves around to meet each crisis in turn. Severe winter weather actually degraded the Soviet artillery preparation (poor visibility limited observed fires).

    Amazon.com: Zhukov's Greatest Defeat: The Red Army's Epic Disaster in Operation Mars, 1942 (Modern War Studies): Books: David M. Glantz,Mary E. Glantz



    Just read the book, if you haven´t. I personally was amazed how close the German lines were from being crushed. Then again nobody incl me had never heard of the battles in the AGC center area in August 1942 where Zhukov tried to make a breakthrough while the world concentrated on the battles in the AGC area. Also in the same book.
     
  9. Epsillon

    Epsillon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    1
    Sound like an intresting book.

    What was the date for operation Uranus?

    Oct-November, 20?
     
  10. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,469
    Likes Received:
    2,208
  11. Epsillon

    Epsillon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    1
    Well didnt the planing start from October?

    The Germans surrendered on the Feb 2?

    Well I havnt gotten any books yet but I was looking through the chapters of one of the books and one of the chapters was called Operation Uranus Oct-Nov 1942.
     
  12. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,469
    Likes Received:
    2,208
    The planning part definitely started something like August-September 1942 at the latest. The operation was probably already planned to start in late Oct but was rescheduled a couple of times. Also in the Glantz book.
     
  13. Epsillon

    Epsillon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    1
    So a reasonable date is oct-feb?
     
  14. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,469
    Likes Received:
    2,208
    Yes. But like said the operation was activated on 19th Nov and I think that counts more than any planning dates.
     
  15. Epsillon

    Epsillon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    1
    Thanks guys for your help!

    I finally got books and to my surprise i got more than I needed. Some of them are in german/russian though i just looked at the title and took it lol.


    here is a picture.

    [​IMG]
     
  16. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,054
    Likes Received:
    2,376
    Location:
    Alabama
    you read all that, and you'll be in here telling us a thing or two....or three or four.........or five.............or six........
     
  17. Za Rodinu

    Za Rodinu Aquila non capit muscas

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    8,809
    Likes Received:
    372
    Location:
    Portugal
    Holy Virgin of Kazan, what library did you plunder?

    I've read a few of those, but here are titles I hadn't even heard of!
     
  18. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,469
    Likes Received:
    2,208
    Yes, that looks good but perhaps 6 months is the minimum to read all those...

    Excellent info in those books!
     
  19. Za Rodinu

    Za Rodinu Aquila non capit muscas

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    8,809
    Likes Received:
    372
    Location:
    Portugal
    Hmm, wrong post.
     
  20. Epsillon

    Epsillon Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2007
    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    1
    Well no way I am going to read all of them lol. Some only got like 5-10 pages on operation Uranus.


    I got them from two libraries. University of British Columbia's Library and Simon Fraser University Library.

    so far just by looking at the books the best one is Battle for Stalingrad by chuikov its really to the point.


    BTW does anyone know what APN stand for? One of my books sais translated by : APN
     

Share This Page