We often mistake Germany's loss because of poor choices by Hitler and his yes men in the upper ranks after 1942. Hitler was convienced that anyone who didn't agree with him was there for against him. However German tactics were scond to none on a large scale. They held off larger forces for years, on tactics alone. This is my question to you. Give Hitler a rational mind From 1936 until Either victory or defeat : Victory is defined as a Hitler run Germany with at least France, The Low Lands , Italy, Spain, and Eastern Europe and Russia to the Volgo River. Assume England is given an honorable surrender. Defeat leaves an intact Germany with Hitler still both alive and fuctional, but no war crimes. This is not a gimmie, and by no means am I suggesting that the Holacaust did not happen, however, there are positions in history where this would not be a factor. I simply ask yuou to take this one all the way out.