Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

The M50 Ontos tank destroyer

Discussion in 'Post-World War 2 Armour' started by Skua, Mar 25, 2004.

  1. Skua

    Skua New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    2,889
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norway
    via TanksinWW2
    This must be the oddest tank destroyer ever. Ontos is Greek for The Thing, a fitting name. Armed with six 106mm recoilless rifles, the top four had each a 12.7mm spotting MG fitted to it. The crew had to leave the vehicle to reload the recoilless rifles. I believe it was used by the U.S. Marines in Vietnam. Entered service sometime around 1960 and was retired during the eighties.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. liang

    liang New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2003
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Oh my god, how to you coordinate the firing of 4 different guns?
     
  3. Mutant Poodle

    Mutant Poodle New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,480
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Jupiter's Fourth Moon.
    via TanksinWW2
    Its dead, Jim
     
  4. Zhukov_2005

    Zhukov_2005 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,652
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Toothless Capital of the World
    via TanksinWW2
    I have seen one of these several times, and it is smaller than it looks. I believe they used them in Vietnam because I remember reading about an incident where an Ontos took out several light NVA tanks.
     
  5. PanzerProfile

    PanzerProfile New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,474
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    Well it shure looks weird to me... 6 barrels, not to be loaded from the inside... a succes in combat?
     
  6. Gatsby phpbb3

    Gatsby phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    Looks like something you'd find in a computer game.

    Hardly looks like a practical design. How could you be expected to aim all 6 barrels accurately?
     
  7. Zhukov_2005

    Zhukov_2005 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,652
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Toothless Capital of the World
    via TanksinWW2
    The guns are recoilless, so aiming is actually not very hard, and with 6 barrels, the more bullets you throw at something, the more of a chance you are going to hit it. Plus, the 12.7mm MGs mounted on the Onto's have only tracer rounds to spot for the main guns.
     
  8. Zable Fahr

    Zable Fahr New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2004
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    This red charnel pit of primal horror, howling bla
    via TanksinWW2
    reloading seems really problematic. the tank would have to withdraw to reload safely...

    the design is pretty cool though
     
  9. PanzerProfile

    PanzerProfile New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,474
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    Pretty weird I'd say!
    Welcome to the forum btw, Zable.
     
  10. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    I saw one of those things at the Amphibious Museum at the Naval Amphibious Base in Little Creek, Virginia. I did a double take the first time I saw it, believe me! :eek:
     
  11. Nashorn phpbb3

    Nashorn phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2004
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Utrecht , the netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    It worked for the marines in NAm though. Because the vehicle was light weight they could transport it anywhere anytime. The ontos was mainly used ( in Nam) for infantry fire support because of the lack of enemy armour.One of th battles they fought in was the battle of Hue city where they were used as mobile artillery.This becaue the ARVN wouldn't give the americans permission to use there artillery in the city ( the 105 mm ans so on). The rouns used were primarily HE and flechette rounds.
     
  12. Mutant Poodle

    Mutant Poodle New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,480
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Jupiter's Fourth Moon.
    via TanksinWW2
    Now take this design idea/concept and use these pieces of equipment.

    !). The latest trageting optic devices for range, day and night, and all weather conditions.
    2). Six belt fed 105mm main guns mounted in two seperate turrets.
    3). Take the Black Eagle design enhancements, in regards to the turret and the amour protected crew compartments.
    4). The Russian anti missle radar and defence system.
    5). Four person crew: Gunner, commander, driver, radio/small arms operator.
    6). All the rest is of the latest components of course.
    7). A targeting computer, for those six main guns.
     
  13. Danyel Phelps

    Danyel Phelps Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    United States
    via TanksinWW2
    ..and you end up with a tank straight out of some freaky deaky sci-fi.

    Which wouldn't be a bad thing.
     
  14. Notmi

    Notmi New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Suomi Finland Perkele
    via TanksinWW2
    Do you actually need six belt-fed main guns?
     
  15. Ricky

    Ricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    The problem there s that your design would be big & heavy, whereas the original was meant to be a light support vehicle...
     

Share This Page