From second-hand bookshop: Mediterranean air war pt 1 and 2 By Christopher F Shores Japanese military aviation by Eiichiro Sekigawa ( for the details of the Kharkhin-Gol actually by the Japanese Air Force )
Kriegsmarine U-Boats 1939-45, by Chris Bishop and Images of Panzer Divisions at War 1939-45, by Ian Baxter
Just finished: Born to Fly (about the EP-3E that was rammed and landed in China 2001)and Knights of the Black Cross. In the middle of: Luftwaffe Over America. Just started: Winston Churchill and the Second Front. Oh and Terror if you like Ambrose try Citizen Soldiers
I agree with Five-Zero-Nan, about Pattons Best. I saw the title (the "Grabber") and perused it at the store and found the very "psyco-babel" mentioned. At first found it was (in an odd way refreshing) but turned to whining immediately. Destroyed my concept of the division and it's record. a must miss
IKE: An American Hero by Michael Korda CLASH OF THE CARRIERS: The True Story of the Marianas Turkey Shoot by Barrett Tillman JIMMY STEWART - BOMBER PILOT by Starr Smith -whatever -Lou
Just started O8-15 the story of Lt Asch. It is a three volume story of a German unit from the early drilling days to the front and ends with the bitter days of 1945. It's a german point of view of the every day soldier who hates Nazis and whose goal is to survive.
Latest on my shelf is Vincent Orange's bio of MRAF Slessor. A good book so far. Orange is still a bit entrenched in his opinion and it does not help that Slessor did not get on with Park whom Orange view as hard done by this animosity. Ross
Lodieu is the leading French WWII historian and a Normandy specialist - "La Massue" (the Mace) is one of his best works...to date though only his III. PZ. Kp (at Kursk) has been translated into English (indifferently I might add...) ..his publisher YSEC is apparently no longer interested in doing an English language edition... pity.. since the Poles fought like tigers on Mont Ormel trying to close the Falaise gap and their achievements should be more widely known IMHO..
Thanks to FalkeEins' ongoing recommendations ( ! ) bought a copy of Lodieu's book about 9th Panzer Division -also from the Mont Ormel museum last week....at least, my schoolboy French can struggle through the captions to the many excellent photos......
I am reading a book called "Lost Victories" from Feldmarschall Manstein. It is a great book; have any of you guys read it? If I may quote something from this book that I think is worth quoting: "The first was the mistake committed by Hitler, if by no one else, of underrating the resources of the Soviet Union and the fighting qualities of the Red Army. In consequence he based everything on the assumption that the Soviet Union could be overthrown by military means in one campaign. Had this even been possible, it could have been achieved only by bringing about the Soviet Union’s simultaneous collapse from within. Yet the policies which Hitler-in complete negation of the efforts of the military authorities-pursued through his Reich Commissioners and Security Service in the occupied territories of the east were bound to achieve the very opposite effect. In other words, while his strategic policy was to demolish the Soviet system with the utmost dispatch, his political actions were diametrically opposed to this. Differences between the aims of the political and military leaders have arisen in other wars. In this case, with the military and political leadership united in Hitler's hands, the result was that his political measures in the east ran entirely counter to the requirements of his strategy, depriving it of whatever chance it may have had of a speedy victory. The second factor was the failure to achieve a uniform strategic policy at the summit-i.e. between Hitler and O.K.H. This applied both to the planning of the overall operation and to its execution in the campaign of 1941. Hitler's strategic aims were based primarily on political and economic considerations. These were: (a) the capture of Leningrad, by which he proposed to join up with the Finns and dominate the Baltic, and (b) possession of the raw material regions of the Ukraine, the armaments centres of the Donetz Basin, and later the Caucasus oilfields. By seizing these territories he hoped to cripple the Soviet war economy completely. O.K.H., on the other hand, rightly contended that the conquest and retention of these undoubtedly important strategic areas depended on first defeating the Red Army. The main body of the latter, they argued, would be met on the road to Moscow, since that city, as the focal point of Soviet power, was one whose loss the regime dares not risk. There were three reasons for this. One was that-in contrast to 1812-Moscow really did form the political centre of Russia; another was that the loss of the armaments areas around and east of Moscow would at least inflict extensive damage on the Soviet war economy. The third and possibly most important reason from the strategic point of view was Moscow's position as the nodal point of European Russia's traffic network. Its loss would slit the Russian defense in two and prevent the Soviet command from ever mounting a single, co-ordinated operation. Viewed strategically, the divergence of views between Hitler and O.K.H. amounted to this: Hitler wanted to seek the issue on both wings(a solution for which, in view of the relative strengths involved and the vastness of the theatre of operations, Germany did not possess adequate force), whereas O.K.H. sought it in the centre of the front."
..BTW the author's web site is here ..he's very approachable and speaks English http://didierlodieu.site.voila.fr/ go to 'catalogue' for details of all his books since recommending the above he's published his latest 'Mourir pour St. Lo' (Dying for St. Lo - the battle for the hedgerows, July 1944)
I tried to read it 10-12 years ago and quit about halfway through it, I just didn't enjoy it. It was a difficult read to me and wonder if it was because of the translation. It read like a bad text book and he seemed, to me, to be always saying that he really wasn't a Nazi and that he hated Hitler, all of which may have been true, but I just grew weary of it. Let me know if you finish it, I give it another try.
I haven't finished it yet. I really think you should give it another try, it is a good book with alot of truth in it.
Just made an order for some Stalingrad books... Amazon.com: An Infantryman In Stalingrad From 24 September 1942 to 2 February 1943: Books: Adelbert Holl An Artilleryman in Stalingrad - Signed/Numbered - Rare Books, Signed Books - World War Two Books – Military History Books online - Ceredigion - Wales UK Amazon.com: Island of Fire: The Battle for the Barrikady Gun Factory in Stalingrad: Books: Jason Mark
wow what a crack up, just received via post Ken Rusts classic 1968 The Slybird Group - the 353rd fighter group. picked this up for a song.........this little book is a hardback and for age and where it was from is in amazing clean condition