No, I get the "point" fully. You cannot be bothered to respond to anything other than your own posts. You also will now waffle for the next few posts in order to obscure the simple fact you had no idea what Ruge's position was in the summer of 1944. So now it is "I don't care what his actual rank and position was, I said he commanded the KM in the West so he did". Your "point" also doesn't exclude the possibility that Ruge was actually Marlene Dietrich in disguise. Is it at all possible for you to maintain even a facade of consistency in your rambling? Was Ruge the "de facto commander of the KM in the West" or was he an "insignifiant [sic]" liar?