Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Battle of Britain

Discussion in 'World War 2' started by E. Rommel phpbb3, May 7, 2005.

  1. PanzerMeister

    PanzerMeister New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    565
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    Hmm...
    Well, some Russian officer answered when an American asked that why didn't SU take Finland: What would we do in a hornet's nest! :D
     
  2. Izaak Stern

    Izaak Stern New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2005
    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    a hornet being..... :D
     
  3. GP

    GP New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    1,432
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    A bl**dy big wasp. ;) ;)
     
  4. Izaak Stern

    Izaak Stern New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2005
    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    I know the bloody bas****!!! I got hit by them. Serious. But - what did it real mean?
     
  5. GP

    GP New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    1,432
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    It is a saying.

    If you disturb a hornets nest you are going to be attacked by them and it will be nasty.
     
  6. Isaac phpbb3

    Isaac phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Holyland
    via TanksinWW2
    I sort of sorted it out for myself. But what hornets are we talking about in THIS PARTICULAR case??? :eek:
     
  7. Ricky

    Ricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    The Finns.

    After all, if the Soviet Union had wanted to, they could have taken Finland in 1944/45.
    So why didn't they?
     
  8. Isaac phpbb3

    Isaac phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Holyland
    via TanksinWW2
    It probably wouldn´t look nice, especially ´cause people remembered the infamous war in 1939 and Stalin didn´t want to remind them. After all, USSR has enough of their own woods and POW-lumberjack - cheaper than Finns.

    Maybe he wanted the Americans out of Europe quick and deal the last blow later? How can I know?

    They talked in Yalta, Potsdam. Stalin seemed uninterested. I think he wanted to show largesse. Finland had no significant heavy industry, like Poland (Upper Silesia) and was sort of - at the perifery if one wants to go west quick - why bother?

    Couldn´t he have taken Finland? Of course he could. I suddenly think that Churchill might frown upon the idea.
    Many possible explanations.
     
  9. Ricky

    Ricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Since when did any of those reasons above bother Comrade Stalin?
    ;)
     
  10. Isaac phpbb3

    Isaac phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Holyland
    via TanksinWW2
    They did, Ricky. Particularly to get the American asses outa here! :lol:
     
  11. PanzerMeister

    PanzerMeister New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    565
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    Dunno if you believe me:
    Americans were good friends with Finland; Finnish ambassador Procopé
    was Roosevelt favourite ambassador. And when Amis send lend-lease to SU, they gave a condition: the material must not be used against Finland. This came true quite well, material used against Finland was 95% Soviet.
    Roosevelt had a deal with Stalin: Finland has to be punished being with the Germans, but not to be conquered.

    Where I got this info? From a Finnish military magazine. The topic was written by an ex-ambassador. It's a while I read it, maybe I can it back to get some more specific info.
     
  12. Isaac phpbb3

    Isaac phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Holyland
    via TanksinWW2
    so, he was able, but couldn´t really...

    I didn´t know! Very interesting.
     
  13. Revere

    Revere New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,094
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Iowa, US
    via TanksinWW2
    alex buenger
    the germans hade a small chance of taking the britsh on in the navy the britsh are predomitly the sea going folks they rellied on the sea for almost every besides the britsh hade only enough food for 40% of there people so they knew it was a weekness so they built up the navey it got a huge bust when it defeated the spanish armada

    -luke downey
     
  14. Stonewall phpbb3

    Stonewall phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2005
    Messages:
    828
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Army of Northern Virginia
    via TanksinWW2
    time for a Finno/Rus war thread...

    equipment

    tactics

    terrain

    troops

    politics


    Cheers
     

Share This Page