Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

High Tech German military

Discussion in 'Armor and Armored Fighting Vehicles' started by JCFalkenbergIII, May 24, 2008.

  1. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426
  2. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426
  3. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426
    [​IMG]
     
  4. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426
    [​IMG]
     
  5. Tomcat

    Tomcat The One From Down Under

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,048
    Likes Received:
    267
    I like that last photo it is good.
     
  6. DocCasualty

    DocCasualty Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Northern Michigan
  7. Vet

    Vet Dishonorably Discharged

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2008
    Messages:
    289
    Likes Received:
    36
    I realize some like to point out the lack of German mechanized transportation. The fact is everybody had their shortcomings. The Soviets relied on western industry to provide it with its needs and the U.S. waited practically three years before it even got heavily involved with the war in Europe. The simple fact is the Wehrmacht was still the best trained army and had the best equipment.
     
  8. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,212
    Likes Received:
    940
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    I think there are those here who would question and seriously debate that that was not true in its entirety.
     
  9. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
    I wonder how many trucks and motor vehicles were lost by the German Army between Summer 1941-May 1944?

    The Germans, at their peak, had 1/3rd motorization in the summer of 1941. If there were no Russian invasion and no serious losses from that theater,the German Army may have achieved near total motorization by May 1944.
     
  10. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,212
    Likes Received:
    940
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    It gets worse for the Germans as the war progresses. Tractor production ceases in late 1941. By the beginning of 1944 most unarmored halftrack production has ended. All those large half track prime movers? What units had was all they were getting.
    Now, the Wehrmachtschlepper halftrack and the RSO did continue in production along with dwindling numbers of Mailter half track truck conversions but, as the war progressed the Germans were in many ways de-motorizing their army.
    It doesn't help that the Luftwaffe and SS were pigs when it came to motor vehicles. Their units often took more than their share of vehicles, particularly the Luftwaffe. This really bit into motorization and keeping units motorized in the Wehrmacht.
    The lack of engineering and construction capacity also just demolished what motor vehicle capacity the Wehrmacht did have. Since the Germans were unable to keep the railways advancing with the army, particularly in Russia, trucks had to be substituted for trains to haul supplies forward. With more construction capacity the Germans might have been able to keep their supply lines open with trains instead of trucks greatly reducing the loss rate of the later through wear and tear.
     
    Vet likes this.
  11. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426
    Ill have to check and see. That report was one of the many I had in my files LOL.
     
  12. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426
    [​IMG]
     
  13. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
    In the early war stage (1939-1941) the SS got shut off and disfavored from the Heer's distribution channels. When did the SS/Luftwaffe gain enough political backing to take more?
     
  14. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426
    [​IMG]
     
  15. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
    I've always been curious about how many tons of supplies were continuously available for a Heer infantry division compared to US Army infantry division in Normandy.
     
  16. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426
    [​IMG]
     
  17. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,212
    Likes Received:
    940
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona

    For things like motor vehicles they simply cut seperate contracts with the suppliers then through their political connections got higher priority for the equipment. The Heer got what was left.
     
  18. Sentinel

    Sentinel Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    47
    The German Army, and Hitler, were apparently planning for a war to start in 1945. Perhaps they would have been fully mechanised by that time, if their original plan had worked.
     
  19. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  20. Tomcat

    Tomcat The One From Down Under

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,048
    Likes Received:
    267
    I have been trying to give you rep for some time now for this thread, and I keepgetting that I have to spread it around. ahh
     

Share This Page