Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

I'm new and have a question

Discussion in 'The Tanks of World War 2' started by Sir_Fragmeister, Dec 20, 2005.

  1. Christian Ankerstjerne

    Christian Ankerstjerne Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,801
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Denmark
    via TanksinWW2
    The Tiger wasn't slow. What would give you that impression?
     
  2. Gunter_Viezenz

    Gunter_Viezenz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    via TanksinWW2
    it was around the same speed as other heavy tanks desinged around the same time ie KV1, the difference in speed was less than 5 mp/h
     
  3. Christian Ankerstjerne

    Christian Ankerstjerne Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,801
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Denmark
    via TanksinWW2
    It was about as fast as the Pz.Kpfw.I.
     
  4. Man

    Man New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,457
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norway
    via TanksinWW2
    The PzKw VI E had approxamitely the same maximum speed as the PzKW IV also, which was around 40 km/h, depending on conditions.

    Source: wwiivehicles.com
     
  5. Gunter_Viezenz

    Gunter_Viezenz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    via TanksinWW2
    I accuse the History chanal documentories for misleading the public about the Tiger tank!
     
  6. Man

    Man New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,457
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norway
    via TanksinWW2
    Before posting anything you have heard on the History Channel or Discovery, I reccomend that you cross-reference the data with reliable internet sources such as:

    panzerworld.net and wwiivehicles.com
     
  7. Gunter_Viezenz

    Gunter_Viezenz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    via TanksinWW2
    I 2nd that motion I have done that msitakes before :(, but I learn from it so its a good thing :D

    Apprently the history chanal is not the most accurate source of information. their information like wikipedia I would not trust my life to very often.
     
  8. Christian Ankerstjerne

    Christian Ankerstjerne Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,801
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Denmark
    via TanksinWW2
    I would extend that accustion to misleading the public in general :)
     
  9. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    Much of the misinformation spread by the History Channel and the Discovery Channel emerges either because only one source is used, or because their programs do not allow them to tell the whole story. For example, if you want to describe the Tiger you could use the powers of hindsight and place the tank in the perspective of the whole war using all available facts and figures, or you could follow the testimony of a single Allied tanker who encountered a Tiger in '42.
     

Share This Page