Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

P-51 Mustang, best Allied fighter or not ?

Discussion in 'Air Warfare' started by Skua, Apr 23, 2004.

  1. PMN1

    PMN1 recruit

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    1
    via TanksinWW2
    Supermarine Spiteful

    Thats what I've read though the aircraft was to progressively embrace a new fuselage.

    Something I've never understood is why despite it being designed from around November 1942 it was still a relatively short range aircraft with a range of around 560 miles clean.

    The need for range was clear by this time and the Mustang had shown what was possible yet the Spiteful was still short range compared to the other allied aircrfat being developed at the time.

    Does anybody have any figures for the fuel load of the Spiteful and the MB5?
     
  2. PMN1

    PMN1 recruit

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    1
    via TanksinWW2
    Corsair

    Our Fleet Air Arm was desperate for any high performance aircraft and would take anything you would give us.

    The nose did cause deck handling problems - it was hard to see over the nose but as I said, we were desperate and just told our pilots to weave while taxiing (I think the Corsair also had an approach pattern that was unique to it but I cant be sure).

    As I mentioned the wings were clipped (by about 16") so we could get them into our hangers.

    When the USN saw how the FAA was coping and needing a high perfromace aircraft to counter the Kamikazes it ended it ban on their use from carriers.
     
  3. PMN1

    PMN1 recruit

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    1
    via TanksinWW2
  4. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    Ah well. We've had plenty and none of them reached an actual conclusion, except for the worst tank of WW2, which turned out to be the horrible Bob Semple tank from New Zealand.
     
  5. Skua

    Skua New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    2,889
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Norway
    via TanksinWW2
    The point isn´t to reach any conclusions, but to have fun and maybe learn a thing or two while having it. ;)
     
  6. Simonr1978

    Simonr1978 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2004
    Messages:
    3,392
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kent, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Agreed

    As for the Mustang / Spitfire...

    The Spitfire MkXIVs were in service before the P-51Ds, and the P-51Hs didn't see service in WWII, so overall except a very short period of time when the P-51B/Cs were available and the MkXIVs weren't the Spitfire was faster and more manouevrable.

    The original P-51 as ordered by the RAF actually had quite a heavy armament, off the top of my head I believe it was 4 20mm cannon in the wings and 2 HMGs in the nose, but I will check and confirm, although it has to be said this had nowhere near the performance of the later P-51Ds.

    PMN1, regarding the CA15 according to one site I've seen it actually reached 502.2 mph in level flight, if true this would make it the 2nd fastest piston engine fighter of all time, also from Corsarius's posts you chould know that the 20mm cannon layout was just one of the armament options considered.

    I do have production figures for most of the common WWII planes, although not to hand. I'll dig out the relevant ones and post soon.
     
  7. SgtBob

    SgtBob New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2003
    Messages:
    545
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    USA
    via TanksinWW2
    P-51B thru P51H - 15,357 machines in service starting in spring, 1942.

    F4U-1 and F4U-4 - 12,571 Machines produced starting October 30, 1942.

    Spitfire Mk.1 thru Mk. XIV - 20,531 machines produced starting in June, 1937. (Three cheers for the Brits, that's a lot of aircraft!)

    These dates are streamlined. I didn't take the time to list design, first prototype flight, first combat, first wing, etc.

    (Complete Book of World War II Combat Aircraft - Angelucci, Enzo 1988)[/b]
     
  8. PMN1

    PMN1 recruit

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    1
    via TanksinWW2
    CA-15

    I read that as well but got the impression it was after a dive - will have to look more closely next time.
     
  9. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Re: Corsair

    The Corsair pilots basically sideslipped their planes while landing on a carrier, to see where they were going by flying at an angle to the ship. They straightened the plane out just before touchdown. Tricky, but it worked.
     
  10. Notmi

    Notmi New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Suomi Finland Perkele
    via TanksinWW2
    Re: Spitfire vs Mustang

    Yeah, but we should remember that Mustang was "nothing to write home about" -high altitude fighter before they replaced those Allisons with licence-build Merlins.
     
  11. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Re: Spitfire vs Mustang

    Yeah, but we should remember that Mustang was "nothing to write home about" -high altitude fighter before they replaced those Allisons with licence-build Merlins.[/quote]

    That was due to its Alison engine, which was designed for best performance at low altitude. The P-40 had a similar engine.
     
  12. Notmi

    Notmi New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Suomi Finland Perkele
    via TanksinWW2
    Re: Spitfire vs Mustang

    Yes, but oddly enough, P-38 used same engines and was efficient as high altitude fighter.
    Edit: Found reason for that: P-38's Allisons had turbosuperchargers and engines planted to other fighters were just supercharged.
     
  13. Tony Williams

    Tony Williams Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,006
    Likes Received:
    23
    via TanksinWW2
    Eric Brown was a WW2 FAA fighter pilot who became a test pilot and ended up flying everything he could. He has written several books comparing the planes he flew - well worth seeking out. He rated the P-51 as an efficient fighter, but the Spitfire was more of a 'pilot's aeroplane' - more responsive and agile.

    IIRC he rated the Spitfire XIV as the finest fighter of the war and his prime choice to fight an air battle with. Of course, that only applied within the Spit's range; the Mustang could go a lot further. The Spit could be fitted with long-range 'ferry' tanks, but these unbalanced the handling so AFAIK were not used in combat.

    Tony Williams
     
  14. GP

    GP New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    1,432
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    Re: Spitfire vs Mustang

    Primary function Fighter
    Power plant One Rolls-Royce Merlin 45 engine
    Thrust 1,440 HP 1,074 kW
    Wingspan 36.8 ft 11.23 m
    Length 29.9 ft 9.12 m
    Height 11.4 ft 3.48 m
    Weight empty 5,100 lb 2,313 kg
    max. 6,786 lb 3,078 kg
    Speed 374 mph 602 km/h
    Ceiling 37,000 ft 11,280 m
    Range 470 mi 756 km
    Armament 2x 20mm cannon, 4x 7.7mm machine gun
    Crew One
    First flight Prototype 5.3.1936 (Mk.IA)
    Date deployed July 1938 (Mk.IA)
    1940 (Mk.VC)
    Number built 20,334 (all versions incl. postwar)
    Primary function Fighter
    Power plant One Rolls-Royce Griffon 69 engine
    Wingspan 35 ft 10.67 m
    Length 32.9 ft 10.03 m
    Height 13.4 ft 4.08 m
    Wingarea 210 sq ft 19.51sq m
    Weight empty 7,350 lb 3,334 kg
    max. 9,950 lb 4,513 kg
    Speed 483 mph 777 km/h
    Ceiling 42,000 ft 12,800 m
    Range 564 mi 908 km
    Armament 4x 20mm cannon
    Crew One
    Date deployed 1945
    Number built 18
    Just some data you might find useful

    and from the same source.

    Primary function Long range fighter
    Contractor North American Aviation Inc.
    Power plant One Allison V-1710-81 engine
    Thrust 1,125 HP 839 kW
    Wingspan 37 ft 11.28 m
    Length 32.25 ft 9.83 m
    Height 12.2 ft 3.71 m
    Wingarea 233 sq ft 21.65 sq m
    Weight empty 6,855 lb 3,110 kg
    max. 10,610 lb 4,812 kg
    Speed 390 mph 628 km/h
    Initial climb rate 2,600 ft/min 792 m/min
    Ceiling 30,000ft 9,144 m
    Range 450 miles 724 km
    Crew One
    Armament 4x 12,7mm machine gun
    First flight October 26, 1940 (NA-73 -also referred to as NA-73X)
    Date deployed 1943
    General characteristics P-51D
    Primary function Long range fighter
    Power plant One Packard V-1650-7 (license-built Rolls-Royce Merlin) liquid-cooled V- 12 engine
    Thrust 1,590 HP 1,186 kW
    Wingspan 37 ft 11.28 m
    Length 32.25 ft 9.83 m
    Height 13.65 ft 4.16 m
    Wingarea 235 sq ft 21.83 sq m
    Weight empty 7,640 lb 3,466 kg
    max. 12,110 lb 5,493 kg
    Max. speed 437 mph 703 km/h
    Initial climb rate 3,478 ft/min 1,060 m/min
    Ceiling 42,000ft 12,800 m
    Max. range 2,068 miles 3,328 km
    Armament 6x 12.7mm machine gun MG53-2 (270 or 400 rounds each), 2x 454kg bombs or 2x external tank.
    Crew One
    Date deployed 1944
    Cost $50,985
    Number built 15,621 (all types)
    I know it is long but this suggest the max speed of the spitfire with the griffeon engine was faster than the p51d. however only 18 were made. We all have our own thoughts on the best fighters in ww2. personally I like the hawker hurricane.

    http://www.military.cz/military_en.htm

    seems to have some good data.
     
  15. GP

    GP New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    1,432
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    Re: Spitfire vs Mustang

    Primary function Fighter
    Power plant One Rolls-Royce Merlin 45 engine
    Thrust 1,440 HP 1,074 kW
    Wingspan 36.8 ft 11.23 m
    Length 29.9 ft 9.12 m
    Height 11.4 ft 3.48 m
    Weight empty 5,100 lb 2,313 kg
    max. 6,786 lb 3,078 kg
    Speed 374 mph 602 km/h
    Ceiling 37,000 ft 11,280 m
    Range 470 mi 756 km
    Armament 2x 20mm cannon, 4x 7.7mm machine gun
    Crew One
    First flight Prototype 5.3.1936 (Mk.IA)
    Date deployed July 1938 (Mk.IA)
    1940 (Mk.VC)
    Number built 20,334 (all versions incl. postwar)
    Primary function Fighter
    Power plant One Rolls-Royce Griffon 69 engine
    Wingspan 35 ft 10.67 m
    Length 32.9 ft 10.03 m
    Height 13.4 ft 4.08 m
    Wingarea 210 sq ft 19.51sq m
    Weight empty 7,350 lb 3,334 kg
    max. 9,950 lb 4,513 kg
    Speed 483 mph 777 km/h
    Ceiling 42,000 ft 12,800 m
    Range 564 mi 908 km
    Armament 4x 20mm cannon
    Crew One
    Date deployed 1945
    Number built 18
    Just some data you might find useful

    and from the same source.

    Primary function Long range fighter
    Contractor North American Aviation Inc.
    Power plant One Allison V-1710-81 engine
    Thrust 1,125 HP 839 kW
    Wingspan 37 ft 11.28 m
    Length 32.25 ft 9.83 m
    Height 12.2 ft 3.71 m
    Wingarea 233 sq ft 21.65 sq m
    Weight empty 6,855 lb 3,110 kg
    max. 10,610 lb 4,812 kg
    Speed 390 mph 628 km/h
    Initial climb rate 2,600 ft/min 792 m/min
    Ceiling 30,000ft 9,144 m
    Range 450 miles 724 km
    Crew One
    Armament 4x 12,7mm machine gun
    First flight October 26, 1940 (NA-73 -also referred to as NA-73X)
    Date deployed 1943
    General characteristics P-51D
    Primary function Long range fighter
    Power plant One Packard V-1650-7 (license-built Rolls-Royce Merlin) liquid-cooled V- 12 engine
    Thrust 1,590 HP 1,186 kW
    Wingspan 37 ft 11.28 m
    Length 32.25 ft 9.83 m
    Height 13.65 ft 4.16 m
    Wingarea 235 sq ft 21.83 sq m
    Weight empty 7,640 lb 3,466 kg
    max. 12,110 lb 5,493 kg
    Max. speed 437 mph 703 km/h
    Initial climb rate 3,478 ft/min 1,060 m/min
    Ceiling 42,000ft 12,800 m
    Max. range 2,068 miles 3,328 km
    Armament 6x 12.7mm machine gun MG53-2 (270 or 400 rounds each), 2x 454kg bombs or 2x external tank.
    Crew One
    Date deployed 1944
    Cost $50,985
    Number built 15,621 (all types)
    I know it is long but this suggest the max speed of the spitfire with the griffeon engine was faster than the p51d. however only 18 were made. We all have our own thoughts on the best fighters in ww2. personally I like the hawker hurricane.

    http://www.military.cz/military_en.htm

    seems to have some good data.
     
  16. Simonr1978

    Simonr1978 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2004
    Messages:
    3,392
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kent, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    trust me, far more that 18 griffon Spits were made!
     
  17. PMN1

    PMN1 recruit

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2004
    Messages:
    1,032
    Likes Received:
    1
    via TanksinWW2
    Griffin Spits and Seafires

    1,800 + Spitfire and 750 + Seafires - i recently read (again) that the Navy considered the Seafire inferior to the Sae Fury and only carried on ordering the Seafire (and thus having two fighter types at a time of austerity) to keep Supermarine in business until they produced their first jet fighter - a return to the pre war approach of drip feeding key suppliers.
     
  18. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Well, you can have your Spitfires and Mustangs, I'll stick to the Corsair. :)
     
  19. Simonr1978

    Simonr1978 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2004
    Messages:
    3,392
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kent, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Damn good choice.

    According to one article I read the only reason the Mustang was ordered in the first place was because the USAAF couldn't bear to order a USN/MC plane!
     
  20. GP

    GP New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    1,432
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    I can only say what I find, have you some other info. Where can I find the details please.
     

Share This Page