Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Sherman Vs. Panzer

Discussion in 'Weapons & Technology in WWII' started by Flyboy to be AKA SASKID, May 1, 2006.

Tags:
  1. Za Rodinu

    Za Rodinu Aquila non capit muscas

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    8,809
    Likes Received:
    372
    Location:
    Portugal
    Oh, sorry!

    The Sherman "benefitted" (some say it didn't work very well) from added protection in the form of logs as you say, sandbags held up by miscellaneous "cages", so to speak, pieces of armour recovered from other tanks and welded in place, etc.

    I know this is a model but the pics are rather clear for the effect intended. Here is the good old Airfix Sherman :)
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426
    IIRC even poured concrete was used.
     
  3. RAM

    RAM Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    507
    Likes Received:
    97
  4. Za Rodinu

    Za Rodinu Aquila non capit muscas

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    8,809
    Likes Received:
    372
    Location:
    Portugal
    Hahahahaha, good one RAM !!
     
  5. Joe

    Joe Ace

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,948
    Likes Received:
    125
    I could go on all night about that article, but I'll save my fingers and go to bed.

    :D
    OK, I'll admit that I made the bit up about the PzKpfw IV's gun decreasing mobility, but it DID make it to forward-heavy. And that's a fact.
    I just wanted to say something in offense of the Panzers.
    And I go back on my statement on post 1942 panzers, I should have said this;
    "IMHO, all post-1942 Panzers (except the Panther) where defensive."
     
  6. Za Rodinu

    Za Rodinu Aquila non capit muscas

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    8,809
    Likes Received:
    372
    Location:
    Portugal
    Ok, that's your opinion, but opinions are like airsoles and your opinion in this particular matter is bovine excrement and you should know it. How do you tell an offensive from a defensive tank? Is this American Football or what?

    How does the same offensive 1942 Pz VI turn into a defensive Pz VI in 1943?
     
  7. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,215
    Likes Received:
    941
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    No, the Panther wasn't just designed for defensive warfare, it was designed by evil genius German engineers to ensure the maximum amount of maintenance and downtime possible! Nothing was too complex or delicate that it couldn't be included in the design!
     
  8. Joe

    Joe Ace

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,948
    Likes Received:
    125
    I would consider them good German engineers as they helped the Allied War effort.

    Alright Alright! I give up!
     
  9. bf109 emil

    bf109 emil Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    146
    Likes Received:
    7
    Where is listed anywhere a Panzer V or Panzer VI where designed as a defensive weapon, please include sources...

    Panther fronter armor, used to be offensive, and spearhead advances..
    Armour on a Panzer VI
     
  10. RAM

    RAM Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2007
    Messages:
    507
    Likes Received:
    97
    What problems and which components are you thinking of in particular?

    Regards
    RAM
     
  11. Joe

    Joe Ace

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,948
    Likes Received:
    125
    My source = 101 things to do with Human Urine.
    :rolleyes:

    For God's sake can we just shut up about my opinion?
     
  12. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426
    LOL. I don't think they will Joe.
     
  13. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,215
    Likes Received:
    941
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona

    Transmission (weak cluches and gears that frequently failed), engine (overstressed, engine fires, cooling problems), interleaved suspension (prone to jamming with mud and rocks, difficult to work on, road wheels overstressed), hull (poor welds that often split, quality of armor used was not consistent), main gun (prone to jamming in recoil), track layout (requires frequent adjustment of tension, prone to pin failure / not long lived), layout of maintenance accesses (poor and complex. Requires considerable effort to get a major components).
    The list is long. The Panther might have been a very dangerous opponet during the half the time that it was running but, it was just too complicated and poorly engineered from a reliability and maintainability point of view for hard use in wartime conditions.
     
  14. Tomcat

    Tomcat The One From Down Under

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,048
    Likes Received:
    267
    Shall I bring up the battle tank argument, or the more recent unfinished light recon tank discussion, to try and sway it away from your opinion?:D
     
  15. Joe

    Joe Ace

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,948
    Likes Received:
    125
    Well it would be more fun than engaging in a conversation with the thread starter, but I doubt they will ever be concluded.



    Or will they.... :evil2: heheheheh...
     
  16. Tomcat

    Tomcat The One From Down Under

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,048
    Likes Received:
    267
    I just noticed the original thread from long ago. The title of the thread says Sherman Vs Panzer, but he asks about the Sherman Vs the Panzer IV not the Panzer V. Was that a typo or lack of knowledge on his part?

    Joe. Maybe we should just leave them all alone and start something new and exciting:D
     
  17. Joe

    Joe Ace

    Joined:
    May 22, 2007
    Messages:
    2,948
    Likes Received:
    125
    I think it's just people referring to all German tanks as a "Panzer", which is correct, really.
    BUT, with his title, he means "Sherman vs Tank", which has no meaning at all.

    Ok then, how about tactics on CoH?
     
  18. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426
    I have seen a similar named thread on another site. I think it is just a lack of knowledge of the term "Panzer".
     
  19. 4th wilts

    4th wilts Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2007
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    29
    o.k gents.i seen pictures of stugs with gert slabs of armour on the sides maybe a foot away from the sides.the same as mk4 panzers.did any shermans get the same.lee.
     
  20. Tomcat

    Tomcat The One From Down Under

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,048
    Likes Received:
    267
    You mean the armoured skirts used to denonate incoming shells?

    Acutally didn't you already ask that question somewhere else, and you got the answer with a picture of a sherman with logs and track pieces on the side of the tank?
     

Share This Page