Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

WWII Forums Quiz Part VII

Discussion in 'Quiz Me!' started by PzJgr, Mar 26, 2007.

Tags:
  1. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,054
    Likes Received:
    2,376
    Location:
    Alabama
    Sumatra was what I was looking for, Java is a different island.

    Go with question.
     
  2. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,208
    Likes Received:
    934
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    Ok, other than caliber, what was unusual and differentiated Soviet artillery battalions in their infantry divisions from those of other nations?
     
  3. WotNoChad?

    WotNoChad? Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2007
    Messages:
    985
    Likes Received:
    134
    Could it be that they were crewed by women?
     
  4. skunk works

    skunk works Ace

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,156
    Likes Received:
    104
    Another "WAG",
    I've heard/read the Russians did have/use the most artillery of any combatant in WW 2, and "of course" artillery did account for the biggest percentage of combat casualties.
    I've also heard/read that their barrages were the least (per gun/round) effective at hitting desired targets.
    Don't misunderstand here, they were devastating (especially later on), it's just that a similar positive (on time-on target) result could've been achieved with fewer guns/rounds. Leaving more units/ammunition for elsewhere.
    So they needed, perhaps better communication/observation/correction, to be on "Par" with their counterparts ? :confused:
     
  5. Sturmkreuz

    Sturmkreuz Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2007
    Messages:
    645
    Likes Received:
    63
    Whose turn it is?
     
  6. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,054
    Likes Received:
    2,376
    Location:
    Alabama
    It's still Terry's. Give a hint, if you can Terry.
     
  7. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,208
    Likes Received:
    934
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    It has nothing to do with tactics or operations but with orgainzation. Look at a TO&E
     
  8. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,054
    Likes Received:
    2,376
    Location:
    Alabama
    Large bore artillery was organizied into seperate units, independent of manuevering units? Smaller guns (45mm & 76mm) were carried by infantry divisions and could be fired in a line-of-site, direct fire role?
     
  9. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,208
    Likes Received:
    934
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    No but, it does have something to do with the caliber of gun being used in a sense.
     
  10. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,208
    Likes Received:
    934
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    Any takers? If not, I'll post the answer and put up an even tougher question. Got the perfect one in mind already.
     
  11. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,054
    Likes Received:
    2,376
    Location:
    Alabama
    One last answer.
    Large calibers could not be requested by smaller units; they only functioned in a pre-planned role, firing on a schedule and at predetermined targets?
     
  12. skunk works

    skunk works Ace

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,156
    Likes Received:
    104
    Only answer I can think of....
    A good portion of their artillery was rocket (and increasing). They had the largest calibers of the war (for mobile...I know the 155), in mm...122 for "arty" and a basic rocket was 130(2) ish.
    Many rockets were mobile (Studebaker trucks) and could be deployed quickly (BM-13), (with lousy accuracy), but quick and smothering fire. Many were not, and took a while to set up, and even longer to reload (BM-31), Shortage of trucks, since most major rocket units (regiment/batallion) were independent units.
    Communication was dependent upon laid wire, and being in communication with a rocket unit, and being able to tell them to fire on a counter attack, or fire upon targets of opportunity (as other nations did) was near (very near) impossible.
    It was pretty much move in close (3,4 miles max range ?), dump everything you got, get out (if you can, to avoid counter battery fire), (too bad for the BM-31 boys), re-load and repeat.
    Unusual for other nations....having no sustainable/correctable fire.
    Good results on static positions though ! :confused:
     
  13. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,208
    Likes Received:
    934
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    The answer is that the Soviets were the only ones to mix calibers on a widespread scale within artillery battalions. Their infantry divisions had artillery battalions of 2 batteries of 76.2mm guns and one of 122mm howitzers. This is unique among the major combatants the rest whom kept the gun size constant within each battalion. The Soviets did this due to a different doctrine on artillery support forced on them by their general lack of good communications equipment within infantry formations.
     
  14. scarface

    scarface Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2007
    Messages:
    662
    Likes Received:
    81
    C'mon, Terry.....


    ..... 'zat the best ya'got????


    .... give us sumthin' HARD!!!

    :eek:

    -whatever

    -Lou
     
  15. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,208
    Likes Received:
    934
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    This ship was built by Germaniawerft, Kiel in 1931 and ended up in the flegeling Israeli Navy in 1947 after spending the war partolling for U-boats. Eventually it ended up in private hands as the yacht Santa Maria del Mare. What was the original name of this ship and its names in naval service during WW 2?
     
  16. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,054
    Likes Received:
    2,376
    Location:
    Alabama
    The Maoz/ K-24, former Aliyah Bet Ben Hecht
     
  17. skunk works

    skunk works Ace

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,156
    Likes Received:
    104
  18. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,208
    Likes Received:
    934
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    You have the pre-war and post war right what about WW 2 itself?
     
  19. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,208
    Likes Received:
    934
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    What? No takers on finishing this one either?!! They are only going to get tougher.....
     
  20. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,054
    Likes Received:
    2,376
    Location:
    Alabama
    I've not been able to locate it.
     

Share This Page